http://www.facebook.com/ext/share.php?sid=77027056588&h=2MqH2&u=hfc4L&ref=nf
In order for there to be a removal of Shariah laws in Europe
the people must rise up and loudly protest,
for too long silence has allowed governments to introduce
appeasement to islamists. The only hope that Europe has is to keep protests loud and peaceful but every single day or week to be held outside parliaments and governments
Monday, May 18, 2009
Saturday, May 9, 2009
The Rise of Islamism- Implications to Womens Rights and Freedoms
The Rise of Islamism, and the Implications to Women’s Rights and to the Philosophy of Feminism, of the spread of Islamism in the Western World
By Tess McNamara
BA Women’s Studies, PPS, BA Family Studies
In the past three decades the phenomenon of mass Islamic immigration into Europe has developed, of which previous, and successive Western Governments had largely un-anticipated, and appeared to ignore or be unable to reverse.
A possible reason for these phenomena could potentially have been in the interests of the failed policies of “Multi-Culturalism” throughout Europe. The policy of Multi-Culturalism was strongly promoted throughout Europe in the 1970 – 1990’s. The “Darling” of the Multiculturalists policies, was the much touted city of Sarajevo, where both Christians and Muslims co inhabited. History has shown that this was an abject failure, resulting in mass murder and genocide of Christians, and outbreak of a vicious war between the Islamists and Christians, with the destruction of Sarajevo.
In Europe currently, there is a very high birth rate amongst immigrant Muslim populations, far higher demographically in numbers, than found amongst the Caucasians of European descent population throughout Western Europe. For the Western Europeans, of traditional European ancestry, their population demography is facing a phenomenal change away from a majority Caucasian and Western European population birth rates within the next thirty years, to one in which the Middle Eastern and African origin Muslim population will potentially dominate.
This has never before been seen in centuries, in Europe since the expulsion of the Muslims Moors, from Spain under Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand.
The Western Europeans are faced with the very serious, and frighteningly real potential implications from this change in the demographic make up of vast areas within Europe, of the potential in the future of being overtaken by the populations of the descendants from the Middle eastern and African Muslims, both politically and physically.
Should this very real demographic threat eventuate, then there is almost certainty, that there will be imposition of Shari’a Laws on Western European populations.
This is a very real possibility within fifty years, or one generation, and the highly likely outcome will result from a situation, which could see the election of a large number of Muslim’s voted into Government power, by the Muslim dominant demographic population, and could bring into Government power, extremist Arabic and African descent Muslims, whom could potentially destroy the democratic laws and way of life enjoyed for centuries by the West.
This would revert Europe into a “Second Dark Ages” of gross injustice, anti-Semitic persecution of The Jews and the Christian Minority groups, which has happened throughout history, when Muslims have been the dominant population in any given nation.
This will bring about the destruction of Democracy, by religious Islamic groups, using the power of voting in elections, in order to remove the right to vote, from the entire European population, which ensured the rights and Freedoms such as what was fought for, in the French Revolution, and the Reformations, as well as the Secularization of Governments in Europe and the Separation of Church and State as taught by Montesquieu Doctrine of the Separation of Powers Treatise.
The brave European and other nations forebears, whom through history fought to liberate Europe from the tyranny of dictators and Theocratic or Ecclesiastic rule in Europe, as well as in World War One and Two, effectively will be defeated by the weapon most feared, which is the womb. The birth rate of natural European Westerners must either increase and compete for dominance, or face the likely outcome of ending up under Islamic domination and tyranny in the next thirty to forty years.
For women, this is particularly a frightening prospect, for it is under the 6th century tribal Arabian origins of Sharia Laws ( laws which are based upon the reported sayings or teachings of Muhammad, a man claimed as illiterate camel caravan trader originally, whom claimed to be a prophet and became later a self proclaimed prophet for Islam’s God deity named Allah)that a woman fares dramatically worse than a man in front of the law, in what can only be seen as the worst least just system of so called Justice which is Patriarchal based, and highly misogynist. Under Shariah Laws, women in the age of the Second Millennium ( 2008) are still treated exactly as they were in sixth century A.D. Arabia by the Shariah.
Under the long established and cherished Western Democratic Laws, a woman has the right to the expectation of fair judgment, equality and equal access to competent legal representation, in all areas of civic life and all laws, and a woman enjoys the protection and the guaranteed equality before the law in absolutely every way in the Western laws.
Women are also able to be Lawyers and Judges under the Western Democratic Laws, and diametrically opposed to this freedom, they can never under the Islamic Sharia laws become Judges.
Indeed it is in the central need in courts of Jurisprudence for proof of a crime, in taking the witness stand to give witness that women are discriminated against within Islam, for under Shariah Laws, it takes the witness of two women to equal that of just one man.
In the online booklet , at the Al-Sunnah.com website, http://www.al-sunnah.com/pdf/womright.pdf
being a guide for women in Islam, it is quoted ” And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men(available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her." (V.2:282”
Why a witness whom saw something or witnessed an event should need coaching or influencing in such a tainting manner is likely to bring about injustice.
Such tainting of evidence would be completely unacceptable under Western Jurisprudence.
Muhammad indeed was claimed to have said, that women possess half the intellect of a man. Any woman alive today, in 2008, who is married to a man, can see clearly how ridiculous such a statement is.
Muhammad clearly had such a high opinion of women, in his reported messages from his worshipped Arabic Deity Allah, and indeed this haunts all Islamic women to his day, their prophet’s low opinion of them, and seriously affects the accuracy and quality of jurisprudence within Shariah Courts in Islamic countries, as it effectively rules out fifty per cent of the population from individually being taken seriously or accurately as a witness.
This is a Patriarchal based idea that women are only half intelligent as a man, or that a woman alone cannot be relied upon for her testimony. This is absurd, nonsensical, and discriminates against all women currently, and indeed just as in Muhammad’s day, this ridiculous gender reductionism and bias has not changed in 1400 years.
How any apologist for Islam can see this as equal treatment to men and women is certainly evidence for use of taqqiyeh by Islamic apologists.
It is indeed modern western women, whom have the most to lose of their hard won and fought for equality of rights, under established western democratic laws, which historically were based on inherited common laws, and parliamentary decrees and proclamation laws, based on the British Westminster System, should the demographic explosion of Muslim migration numbers bring such a change in the traditional laws in the west away from western common laws and democratic rule of law to the repressive, harsh and discriminatory bigoted Shariah Laws.
Feminist silence on Women’s abuse within Islam, the theology and the dogma, and Shariah Laws relatively speaking, is alarming for any whom believe in the role of Feminism to champion women’s rights world wide, and not just where it is safe to do so in the west.
All women must ask the post modernist Feminist Lobby, “what have you really achieved, in the past 50 years, if the only way that you can make a change is in the west, and not where the women are truly oppressed?”.
Indeed where are this illusionary Feminist Academics and why have they not taken the plight of women in middle east and within Islamic societies to the U.N. or the various international Human Rights bodies. Why are feminists not taking to the streets in street protest marches reminiscent of the Suffragette Emily Pankhurst era?.
Islamic domination in demographics of Europe has largely been as a result of largely uncontrolled, steady mass immigration by those of Arabic Islamic heritage culture and religious practices and beliefs, which are incompatible with the rights and freedoms which are enshrined in the Democratic laws of the Western European nations.
Other Western nations are now seeing the flow on effects, from such migration numbers of Muslims, in countries such as USA and Australia as well.
In Europe currently, there is a very high birth rate amongst immigrant Muslim populations, far higher demographically in numbers, than found amongst the Caucasians of European-descent population throughout Western Europe. It has for the Europeans of traditional Caucasian European born- ancestry population, serious implications from the rapid demographic shifts in numbers of Muslims in Europe.
Recent evidence is emerging from census information released by different European countries, that Europe is in the midst of the shifts in demography, such as the presence in Europe, of 53 Million Muslims, “According to the Zentral-Institut Islam-Archiv-Deutschland, published in the German Soest, there are 53.7 million Muslims in Europe today.
This is reported on, in the source Reformatorisch Dagblad. http://www.refdag.nl/”.
On April 21 / 22, 2007, as reported in the magazine called “Counter Punch”, Kristoffer Larsson, in “The Islamic Threat to Europe: By the Numbers”, the author discusses concern of the failure of the mainstream European media to report on items involving Islamic terrorism in Europe.
According to Kristoffer Larsson, “498 incidents in eleven EU countries last year labeled as "terrorist attacks.”. These were largely under reported or not reported at all in the media in the countries where such attacks occurred.
In Europe, the official organization named “Europol”, released the “EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2007.
It is stated in the report, that there are a “large number” of terrorist organizations”, which “have an active presence in the EU”. (Page 3 of the Executive Summary, Europe
Reference: www.europol.europa.eu/publications/TESAT/TESAT2007.pdf
It is of concern that the report also states that the terrorist organizations present in Europe, “Use the EU as their logistical base or for fundraising”. Pg 3.
The report also discusses the importance of the investigation of Islamic Terrorism Organizations as a priority for the various member states law enforcement agencies, in countries within European Union. The basis of this being identified as a priority for law enforcement agencies in Europe was the identified large numbers of arrested suspects.
The report also discusses the foiled Islamic terrorist plots of the London, and German “trolley” plot, of 2007 and shows the intention of such Islamic terrorists groups to inflict mass casualties.
Even after the above countries reported the failed attempts, they also reported another attempt by Islamic terrorist s each in 2006.
In the report the countries of France, Spain, and the UK, are identified as the countries, which have suffered the most, under attacks of terrorism.
Germany, Denmark and the UK also reported apart from the previous Islamic Terrorist attempt
And “, in which it is claimed only one terrorist attack released in 2007 by Europol report.EPORT
2007
Groups of radical Islamists are openly calling for the killing of non-Muslims, particularly Jews and Christians, with apparent impunity from arrest and prosecution, in highly threatening protests marches designed to intimidate the local populace.
A recent example of such an occurrence in London in 2007, involved mass protests by Muslims, in a street march bearing placards with threatening messages such as “Europe Beware: the Real Holocaust is Coming”, “Behead the Infidels”, “Kill the Jews” and “Sharia law now”.
Demographic evidence has been growing particularly in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom, that Islamic migrants, many of whom speak only Arabic, have formed extremely inclusive, Muslim-only, completely separate enclaves of Islamists in those particular areas of Europe. Steadfastly, Islamists have refused to immerse themselves socially and economically within the countries which shelter them. They act in a manner which is incongruent with local traditions, and refuse to assimilate into the society in which they have chosen to live.
Islamists often are seen as intimidating by western locals, or as deliberately highly visible minority groups, wearing Arabic clothing, especially the Burkha and the Hejab, defying opposition to wearing of such garments in public by the native born Europeans, whom see the enforced covering of the head and faces of women in particular to be very offensive, and oppressive to women.
The wearing of such Islamic clothing often appears to the modern westerner, as both a bizarre, anachronistic, archaic, regressive form of dressing, as if one had just stepped straight from the Middle Eastern 6th century era.
The arrogant refusal by Islamists to abandon such style of dressing, is a highly visible trend, and very threatening to brave women, who refuse to consider such a backward, regressive, oppressive, dress form which is hiding of one’s face and body and personality, in order to obey the dictates of a male dominated society, of the middle east origin which has no place or relevance for a western raised woman.
Religious Islamic Decrees dictates to the Islamic Umma, to wear the bizarre tent like hot and stuffy in summer Hejab and other forms of such bronze age type dressing, in order to hide women’s personalities, their faces and bodies from being seen. In the online booklet,
http://www.al-sunnah.com/pdf/womright.pdf
it is stated that ,
” "And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and protect their
private parts and not to show off their adornment except only that which
is apparent, and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e., their bodies,
faces, necks and bosoms) and not to reveal their adornment except to their
husbands, or their fathers, or their husband's fathers, or their sons, or
their husband's Sons, or their brothers or their brother's sons, or their
sister's sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e., their sisters in Islam), or the
(female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who
lack vigor, or small children who have no sense of feminine sex. And let
them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide ~of their
adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that
you may be successful." (V. 24:3 1)
It is particularly alarming to the native born persons of European descent, who see the particular ethnically identified Muslim migrants acting in such a disturbingly arrogant manner to the host country, ignoring the social norms of such countries with overt hostility.
Frequently on the various Islamic organizations and terrorist’s groups websites on the internet, street protests of Muslims in the UK, Islamic migrants and Clerics in their own words, are seen, filmed and often photographed in mosques, calling for the overturning of Western equality-based democratic laws in a highly destructive manner.
The laws at the centre of their calls to be overthrown by either legal jihad or violent jihad, are of historically hard fought and won freedoms enshrined in democracy importance in the West.
The Islamists are often seen launching loud, highly visible protests calling for the killing of non-Muslims, and spread of Jihadist websites, which are contrary to the foundations of freedoms of democracy.
Recently the Arch-Bishop of the Anglican Church, in London, claimed that it was going to be an inevitable fact of the introduction of Islamic Shariah Laws into the UK, because of the numbers of Muslims in the UK in order to keep the peace, such as Shariah-compliant banking laws, Shariah compliant Divorce courts and Marriage/ Family Custody as a second yet equally binding presence; despite being in contradiction to the long established western democratic laws which promote equality between men and women.
Extremely deadly, sinister and life threatening aspects of the barbaric and obscene archaic Shariah Laws of Islam, is the harshness of any punishments metered out to the innocent female victims of rape ( to be hanged or killed), homosexuals, and numbers of other stipulated victims of criminals.
The archaic and often senseless treatment by Islamic Shariah Laws towards the innocent victims of crimes of sexual abuse and rape, and such prisoners, are in direct opposition to the fairer and more humane punishments of our Democratic Laws and the rights of the accused or victims amongst Western Justice Systems, which encourage the more gentler re-habilitation and re education, and re training in life skills, to the convicted prisoners rather than beheading or chopping off feet and hands as under Shariah.
A massive difference between the psychology of how the victims of rape and sexual abuse of young girls or women in the western laws, compared to how they are considered under the more arabic tribalistic origins of Shariah Laws, is the fact that in Shariah Laws, all rape victims are considered that it is their fault, by the fact that they are there and present in order to be raped, therefore it has to be their fault.
It is also a Koranic and Hadith teaching, that it is women, who are the corrupters of men, therefore men are unable to help themselves or control their own lusts and so it therefore the woman or girls fault that’ she was raped by any man.
In the Western Legal Democratic traditions, Women’s rights to equality before the law and to the equal protection under the law, ensures that women are protected if possible, from any further assaults by the perpetrator, by protecting the victim in any way possible such as safe houses or women’s refuges, and together by jailing and harsh punishment of the perpetrator of the sexual assault or abuse.
The victim is usually also entitled to sue for Criminal Injuries Compensation for the injuries sustained during the rape.
Our Western Democratic ( in particular western Australian ) laws do not punish and blame the victim, as Islamic laws obscenely do, in such a fatal, punishing, way which is inexplicably designed to punish the victim by killing her, for so called “adultery” or “acts against chastity”, such as in Iran, Saudi Arabia and most other Muslim countries under Shari’a Laws, and effectively excuses the male from ownership of responsibility for his own acts, and allows the male to get away with the crime.
Our Western laws, do not inflict such harsh punishments as the hanging of homosexuals as witnessed recently in Iran, and the killing of adulterers by beheading in Saudi Arabia, or their stoning as in Iran, or the cutting off of hands and feet of petty criminals as prescribed punishments under Shariah Law.
Western Governments have discovered to their disadvantage, that a vast number of the Arabic speaking migrants in UK are, or have in the past refused to integrate within local communities, in some countries such as U.K. it has been discovered that these immigrants of Arabic Middle Eastern or African Islamic origins, refuse to allow their own children to attend public schools, or to become educated in western scholastic traditions, but have instead clung to the traditional Madrassa style Arabic speaking and Arabic Islamism teaching schools.
Supervision and monitoring of school attendance has become a particular problem for State Education Authorities in the U.K. particularly, as there has been reported numerous disappearances from UK of school aged minors, which it is suspected have been sent overseas for arranged marriages. This presents a major challenge for the empowerment and education of the female children of migrants from oppressive patriarchal societies, in that these female children are considered little more than commercial products able to be bought and sold for the bride price or dowry, and are prevented from ever being able to enjoy the freedoms that their parents and siblings do, by being sold off and sent overseas to an unfamiliar place and forced to marry often against their will to a complete stranger or in many cases cousins in the tribe or family. Feminism remains dangerously remarkably silent on the oppression such children and females, and remains silent as to the continuing degradation of women under Shariah Laws and the treatment by Islamic Laws of rape victims and victims of female genital mutilation.
For Feminism as a philosophical Science, to have a future in modernity, post modernism, or any credibility as a recognized philosophy enabling social change or influence, it is Feminists themselves, who must either become fervently vocal and take overt actions to empower the forgotten victims of Islam, or forever be relegated to ineffectual irrelevance in future.
A disturbing trend in Europe and America also, is the massive influx of non English speaking illegal migrants in the western countries and in particular within Europe such as Denmark and France, and U.K. whom originate, from countries in the Middle East, since the now infamous oil crises of the 1970’s. It has brought with it some serious implications to the West, for the very core Democratic Freedoms experienced by all women in the west.
Inherent in this push by Islamists for greater rights and stealth introduction of shariah compliant laws is the potential for in the future, those very real women’s rights being eroded and removed by islamist’s, intent on replacing western nations democratic values and freedoms, with the laws encoded under Islamic Sharia Laws. These are a series of Patriarchal inspired and oppressive laws which are misogynistic and obscenely undemocratic by Theocratic Islamic Decree, implemented rules based on what the prophet of Islam Muhammad was thought to have either said or decreed in terms of what his God Allah he believed wanted all of humanity to adhere to. Failure to obey often means death to those who defy them.
With its increasing influence of demographical populous numbers, on the mainstream populations, of places such as Europe, resulted in a push by the Islamists against the rights of women to work, to vote, to walk alone without escort, to be able to not wear a head covering.
Photographs are often seen of Western Women in positions of Power and Influence in Government in the West, such as Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush and other First Lady’s submitting to the absurdity of the dictates of Islamic Patriarchy and submissively wearing Hejab’s in front of men on State Visits which as a Feminist, I shudder in horror and disgust at the willingness of these women in positions of power to effecting capitulate in the interests of oil and economic advantages of their nations and the betrayal of the Feminist Ideas of the West. I ask, Where is Emily Pankhurst and the spirit of the Western Suffragettes now?.
By Tess McNamara
BA Women’s Studies, PPS, BA Family Studies
In the past three decades the phenomenon of mass Islamic immigration into Europe has developed, of which previous, and successive Western Governments had largely un-anticipated, and appeared to ignore or be unable to reverse.
A possible reason for these phenomena could potentially have been in the interests of the failed policies of “Multi-Culturalism” throughout Europe. The policy of Multi-Culturalism was strongly promoted throughout Europe in the 1970 – 1990’s. The “Darling” of the Multiculturalists policies, was the much touted city of Sarajevo, where both Christians and Muslims co inhabited. History has shown that this was an abject failure, resulting in mass murder and genocide of Christians, and outbreak of a vicious war between the Islamists and Christians, with the destruction of Sarajevo.
In Europe currently, there is a very high birth rate amongst immigrant Muslim populations, far higher demographically in numbers, than found amongst the Caucasians of European descent population throughout Western Europe. For the Western Europeans, of traditional European ancestry, their population demography is facing a phenomenal change away from a majority Caucasian and Western European population birth rates within the next thirty years, to one in which the Middle Eastern and African origin Muslim population will potentially dominate.
This has never before been seen in centuries, in Europe since the expulsion of the Muslims Moors, from Spain under Queen Isabella and King Ferdinand.
The Western Europeans are faced with the very serious, and frighteningly real potential implications from this change in the demographic make up of vast areas within Europe, of the potential in the future of being overtaken by the populations of the descendants from the Middle eastern and African Muslims, both politically and physically.
Should this very real demographic threat eventuate, then there is almost certainty, that there will be imposition of Shari’a Laws on Western European populations.
This is a very real possibility within fifty years, or one generation, and the highly likely outcome will result from a situation, which could see the election of a large number of Muslim’s voted into Government power, by the Muslim dominant demographic population, and could bring into Government power, extremist Arabic and African descent Muslims, whom could potentially destroy the democratic laws and way of life enjoyed for centuries by the West.
This would revert Europe into a “Second Dark Ages” of gross injustice, anti-Semitic persecution of The Jews and the Christian Minority groups, which has happened throughout history, when Muslims have been the dominant population in any given nation.
This will bring about the destruction of Democracy, by religious Islamic groups, using the power of voting in elections, in order to remove the right to vote, from the entire European population, which ensured the rights and Freedoms such as what was fought for, in the French Revolution, and the Reformations, as well as the Secularization of Governments in Europe and the Separation of Church and State as taught by Montesquieu Doctrine of the Separation of Powers Treatise.
The brave European and other nations forebears, whom through history fought to liberate Europe from the tyranny of dictators and Theocratic or Ecclesiastic rule in Europe, as well as in World War One and Two, effectively will be defeated by the weapon most feared, which is the womb. The birth rate of natural European Westerners must either increase and compete for dominance, or face the likely outcome of ending up under Islamic domination and tyranny in the next thirty to forty years.
For women, this is particularly a frightening prospect, for it is under the 6th century tribal Arabian origins of Sharia Laws ( laws which are based upon the reported sayings or teachings of Muhammad, a man claimed as illiterate camel caravan trader originally, whom claimed to be a prophet and became later a self proclaimed prophet for Islam’s God deity named Allah)that a woman fares dramatically worse than a man in front of the law, in what can only be seen as the worst least just system of so called Justice which is Patriarchal based, and highly misogynist. Under Shariah Laws, women in the age of the Second Millennium ( 2008) are still treated exactly as they were in sixth century A.D. Arabia by the Shariah.
Under the long established and cherished Western Democratic Laws, a woman has the right to the expectation of fair judgment, equality and equal access to competent legal representation, in all areas of civic life and all laws, and a woman enjoys the protection and the guaranteed equality before the law in absolutely every way in the Western laws.
Women are also able to be Lawyers and Judges under the Western Democratic Laws, and diametrically opposed to this freedom, they can never under the Islamic Sharia laws become Judges.
Indeed it is in the central need in courts of Jurisprudence for proof of a crime, in taking the witness stand to give witness that women are discriminated against within Islam, for under Shariah Laws, it takes the witness of two women to equal that of just one man.
In the online booklet , at the Al-Sunnah.com website, http://www.al-sunnah.com/pdf/womright.pdf
being a guide for women in Islam, it is quoted ” And get two witnesses out of your own men. And if there are not two men(available), then a man and two women, such as you agree for witnesses, so that if one of them (two women) errs, the other can remind her." (V.2:282”
Why a witness whom saw something or witnessed an event should need coaching or influencing in such a tainting manner is likely to bring about injustice.
Such tainting of evidence would be completely unacceptable under Western Jurisprudence.
Muhammad indeed was claimed to have said, that women possess half the intellect of a man. Any woman alive today, in 2008, who is married to a man, can see clearly how ridiculous such a statement is.
Muhammad clearly had such a high opinion of women, in his reported messages from his worshipped Arabic Deity Allah, and indeed this haunts all Islamic women to his day, their prophet’s low opinion of them, and seriously affects the accuracy and quality of jurisprudence within Shariah Courts in Islamic countries, as it effectively rules out fifty per cent of the population from individually being taken seriously or accurately as a witness.
This is a Patriarchal based idea that women are only half intelligent as a man, or that a woman alone cannot be relied upon for her testimony. This is absurd, nonsensical, and discriminates against all women currently, and indeed just as in Muhammad’s day, this ridiculous gender reductionism and bias has not changed in 1400 years.
How any apologist for Islam can see this as equal treatment to men and women is certainly evidence for use of taqqiyeh by Islamic apologists.
It is indeed modern western women, whom have the most to lose of their hard won and fought for equality of rights, under established western democratic laws, which historically were based on inherited common laws, and parliamentary decrees and proclamation laws, based on the British Westminster System, should the demographic explosion of Muslim migration numbers bring such a change in the traditional laws in the west away from western common laws and democratic rule of law to the repressive, harsh and discriminatory bigoted Shariah Laws.
Feminist silence on Women’s abuse within Islam, the theology and the dogma, and Shariah Laws relatively speaking, is alarming for any whom believe in the role of Feminism to champion women’s rights world wide, and not just where it is safe to do so in the west.
All women must ask the post modernist Feminist Lobby, “what have you really achieved, in the past 50 years, if the only way that you can make a change is in the west, and not where the women are truly oppressed?”.
Indeed where are this illusionary Feminist Academics and why have they not taken the plight of women in middle east and within Islamic societies to the U.N. or the various international Human Rights bodies. Why are feminists not taking to the streets in street protest marches reminiscent of the Suffragette Emily Pankhurst era?.
Islamic domination in demographics of Europe has largely been as a result of largely uncontrolled, steady mass immigration by those of Arabic Islamic heritage culture and religious practices and beliefs, which are incompatible with the rights and freedoms which are enshrined in the Democratic laws of the Western European nations.
Other Western nations are now seeing the flow on effects, from such migration numbers of Muslims, in countries such as USA and Australia as well.
In Europe currently, there is a very high birth rate amongst immigrant Muslim populations, far higher demographically in numbers, than found amongst the Caucasians of European-descent population throughout Western Europe. It has for the Europeans of traditional Caucasian European born- ancestry population, serious implications from the rapid demographic shifts in numbers of Muslims in Europe.
Recent evidence is emerging from census information released by different European countries, that Europe is in the midst of the shifts in demography, such as the presence in Europe, of 53 Million Muslims, “According to the Zentral-Institut Islam-Archiv-Deutschland, published in the German Soest, there are 53.7 million Muslims in Europe today.
This is reported on, in the source Reformatorisch Dagblad. http://www.refdag.nl/”.
On April 21 / 22, 2007, as reported in the magazine called “Counter Punch”, Kristoffer Larsson, in “The Islamic Threat to Europe: By the Numbers”, the author discusses concern of the failure of the mainstream European media to report on items involving Islamic terrorism in Europe.
According to Kristoffer Larsson, “498 incidents in eleven EU countries last year labeled as "terrorist attacks.”. These were largely under reported or not reported at all in the media in the countries where such attacks occurred.
In Europe, the official organization named “Europol”, released the “EU Terrorism Situation and Trend Report 2007.
It is stated in the report, that there are a “large number” of terrorist organizations”, which “have an active presence in the EU”. (Page 3 of the Executive Summary, Europe
Reference: www.europol.europa.eu/publications/TESAT/TESAT2007.pdf
It is of concern that the report also states that the terrorist organizations present in Europe, “Use the EU as their logistical base or for fundraising”. Pg 3.
The report also discusses the importance of the investigation of Islamic Terrorism Organizations as a priority for the various member states law enforcement agencies, in countries within European Union. The basis of this being identified as a priority for law enforcement agencies in Europe was the identified large numbers of arrested suspects.
The report also discusses the foiled Islamic terrorist plots of the London, and German “trolley” plot, of 2007 and shows the intention of such Islamic terrorists groups to inflict mass casualties.
Even after the above countries reported the failed attempts, they also reported another attempt by Islamic terrorist s each in 2006.
In the report the countries of France, Spain, and the UK, are identified as the countries, which have suffered the most, under attacks of terrorism.
Germany, Denmark and the UK also reported apart from the previous Islamic Terrorist attempt
And “, in which it is claimed only one terrorist attack released in 2007 by Europol report.EPORT
2007
Groups of radical Islamists are openly calling for the killing of non-Muslims, particularly Jews and Christians, with apparent impunity from arrest and prosecution, in highly threatening protests marches designed to intimidate the local populace.
A recent example of such an occurrence in London in 2007, involved mass protests by Muslims, in a street march bearing placards with threatening messages such as “Europe Beware: the Real Holocaust is Coming”, “Behead the Infidels”, “Kill the Jews” and “Sharia law now”.
Demographic evidence has been growing particularly in Denmark, France and the United Kingdom, that Islamic migrants, many of whom speak only Arabic, have formed extremely inclusive, Muslim-only, completely separate enclaves of Islamists in those particular areas of Europe. Steadfastly, Islamists have refused to immerse themselves socially and economically within the countries which shelter them. They act in a manner which is incongruent with local traditions, and refuse to assimilate into the society in which they have chosen to live.
Islamists often are seen as intimidating by western locals, or as deliberately highly visible minority groups, wearing Arabic clothing, especially the Burkha and the Hejab, defying opposition to wearing of such garments in public by the native born Europeans, whom see the enforced covering of the head and faces of women in particular to be very offensive, and oppressive to women.
The wearing of such Islamic clothing often appears to the modern westerner, as both a bizarre, anachronistic, archaic, regressive form of dressing, as if one had just stepped straight from the Middle Eastern 6th century era.
The arrogant refusal by Islamists to abandon such style of dressing, is a highly visible trend, and very threatening to brave women, who refuse to consider such a backward, regressive, oppressive, dress form which is hiding of one’s face and body and personality, in order to obey the dictates of a male dominated society, of the middle east origin which has no place or relevance for a western raised woman.
Religious Islamic Decrees dictates to the Islamic Umma, to wear the bizarre tent like hot and stuffy in summer Hejab and other forms of such bronze age type dressing, in order to hide women’s personalities, their faces and bodies from being seen. In the online booklet,
http://www.al-sunnah.com/pdf/womright.pdf
it is stated that ,
” "And tell the believing women to lower their gaze and protect their
private parts and not to show off their adornment except only that which
is apparent, and to draw their veils all over Juyubihinna (i.e., their bodies,
faces, necks and bosoms) and not to reveal their adornment except to their
husbands, or their fathers, or their husband's fathers, or their sons, or
their husband's Sons, or their brothers or their brother's sons, or their
sister's sons, or their (Muslim) women (i.e., their sisters in Islam), or the
(female) slaves whom their right hands possess, or old male servants who
lack vigor, or small children who have no sense of feminine sex. And let
them not stamp their feet so as to reveal what they hide ~of their
adornment. And all of you beg Allah to forgive you all, O believers, that
you may be successful." (V. 24:3 1)
It is particularly alarming to the native born persons of European descent, who see the particular ethnically identified Muslim migrants acting in such a disturbingly arrogant manner to the host country, ignoring the social norms of such countries with overt hostility.
Frequently on the various Islamic organizations and terrorist’s groups websites on the internet, street protests of Muslims in the UK, Islamic migrants and Clerics in their own words, are seen, filmed and often photographed in mosques, calling for the overturning of Western equality-based democratic laws in a highly destructive manner.
The laws at the centre of their calls to be overthrown by either legal jihad or violent jihad, are of historically hard fought and won freedoms enshrined in democracy importance in the West.
The Islamists are often seen launching loud, highly visible protests calling for the killing of non-Muslims, and spread of Jihadist websites, which are contrary to the foundations of freedoms of democracy.
Recently the Arch-Bishop of the Anglican Church, in London, claimed that it was going to be an inevitable fact of the introduction of Islamic Shariah Laws into the UK, because of the numbers of Muslims in the UK in order to keep the peace, such as Shariah-compliant banking laws, Shariah compliant Divorce courts and Marriage/ Family Custody as a second yet equally binding presence; despite being in contradiction to the long established western democratic laws which promote equality between men and women.
Extremely deadly, sinister and life threatening aspects of the barbaric and obscene archaic Shariah Laws of Islam, is the harshness of any punishments metered out to the innocent female victims of rape ( to be hanged or killed), homosexuals, and numbers of other stipulated victims of criminals.
The archaic and often senseless treatment by Islamic Shariah Laws towards the innocent victims of crimes of sexual abuse and rape, and such prisoners, are in direct opposition to the fairer and more humane punishments of our Democratic Laws and the rights of the accused or victims amongst Western Justice Systems, which encourage the more gentler re-habilitation and re education, and re training in life skills, to the convicted prisoners rather than beheading or chopping off feet and hands as under Shariah.
A massive difference between the psychology of how the victims of rape and sexual abuse of young girls or women in the western laws, compared to how they are considered under the more arabic tribalistic origins of Shariah Laws, is the fact that in Shariah Laws, all rape victims are considered that it is their fault, by the fact that they are there and present in order to be raped, therefore it has to be their fault.
It is also a Koranic and Hadith teaching, that it is women, who are the corrupters of men, therefore men are unable to help themselves or control their own lusts and so it therefore the woman or girls fault that’ she was raped by any man.
In the Western Legal Democratic traditions, Women’s rights to equality before the law and to the equal protection under the law, ensures that women are protected if possible, from any further assaults by the perpetrator, by protecting the victim in any way possible such as safe houses or women’s refuges, and together by jailing and harsh punishment of the perpetrator of the sexual assault or abuse.
The victim is usually also entitled to sue for Criminal Injuries Compensation for the injuries sustained during the rape.
Our Western Democratic ( in particular western Australian ) laws do not punish and blame the victim, as Islamic laws obscenely do, in such a fatal, punishing, way which is inexplicably designed to punish the victim by killing her, for so called “adultery” or “acts against chastity”, such as in Iran, Saudi Arabia and most other Muslim countries under Shari’a Laws, and effectively excuses the male from ownership of responsibility for his own acts, and allows the male to get away with the crime.
Our Western laws, do not inflict such harsh punishments as the hanging of homosexuals as witnessed recently in Iran, and the killing of adulterers by beheading in Saudi Arabia, or their stoning as in Iran, or the cutting off of hands and feet of petty criminals as prescribed punishments under Shariah Law.
Western Governments have discovered to their disadvantage, that a vast number of the Arabic speaking migrants in UK are, or have in the past refused to integrate within local communities, in some countries such as U.K. it has been discovered that these immigrants of Arabic Middle Eastern or African Islamic origins, refuse to allow their own children to attend public schools, or to become educated in western scholastic traditions, but have instead clung to the traditional Madrassa style Arabic speaking and Arabic Islamism teaching schools.
Supervision and monitoring of school attendance has become a particular problem for State Education Authorities in the U.K. particularly, as there has been reported numerous disappearances from UK of school aged minors, which it is suspected have been sent overseas for arranged marriages. This presents a major challenge for the empowerment and education of the female children of migrants from oppressive patriarchal societies, in that these female children are considered little more than commercial products able to be bought and sold for the bride price or dowry, and are prevented from ever being able to enjoy the freedoms that their parents and siblings do, by being sold off and sent overseas to an unfamiliar place and forced to marry often against their will to a complete stranger or in many cases cousins in the tribe or family. Feminism remains dangerously remarkably silent on the oppression such children and females, and remains silent as to the continuing degradation of women under Shariah Laws and the treatment by Islamic Laws of rape victims and victims of female genital mutilation.
For Feminism as a philosophical Science, to have a future in modernity, post modernism, or any credibility as a recognized philosophy enabling social change or influence, it is Feminists themselves, who must either become fervently vocal and take overt actions to empower the forgotten victims of Islam, or forever be relegated to ineffectual irrelevance in future.
A disturbing trend in Europe and America also, is the massive influx of non English speaking illegal migrants in the western countries and in particular within Europe such as Denmark and France, and U.K. whom originate, from countries in the Middle East, since the now infamous oil crises of the 1970’s. It has brought with it some serious implications to the West, for the very core Democratic Freedoms experienced by all women in the west.
Inherent in this push by Islamists for greater rights and stealth introduction of shariah compliant laws is the potential for in the future, those very real women’s rights being eroded and removed by islamist’s, intent on replacing western nations democratic values and freedoms, with the laws encoded under Islamic Sharia Laws. These are a series of Patriarchal inspired and oppressive laws which are misogynistic and obscenely undemocratic by Theocratic Islamic Decree, implemented rules based on what the prophet of Islam Muhammad was thought to have either said or decreed in terms of what his God Allah he believed wanted all of humanity to adhere to. Failure to obey often means death to those who defy them.
With its increasing influence of demographical populous numbers, on the mainstream populations, of places such as Europe, resulted in a push by the Islamists against the rights of women to work, to vote, to walk alone without escort, to be able to not wear a head covering.
Photographs are often seen of Western Women in positions of Power and Influence in Government in the West, such as Hillary Clinton, Laura Bush and other First Lady’s submitting to the absurdity of the dictates of Islamic Patriarchy and submissively wearing Hejab’s in front of men on State Visits which as a Feminist, I shudder in horror and disgust at the willingness of these women in positions of power to effecting capitulate in the interests of oil and economic advantages of their nations and the betrayal of the Feminist Ideas of the West. I ask, Where is Emily Pankhurst and the spirit of the Western Suffragettes now?.
The Threat to all from islamists amongst us
The Threat of Islam
To Western Women
and Men.
By Tess McNamara
B.A. Women’s Studies
B.A. Family Studies.
In the past thirty years, a relatively unknown phenomenon has been happening by stealth, largely unnoticed by the general population until it was too late to protest, and by complicit western government’s support and encouragement, which was the immigration by Muslim men and women to the west, numbering in the post 70’s to the multi- millions- currently over 57 million Muslims in Europe alone.
With this came many social problems facing the west, of social discord between people of the opposing faiths, demands by Muslims for special privileges and special status, and governments appear unable and unwilling to make any decisions to solve the problems inherent with a culture and ideology which is antagonistic to the western ideals of freedoms, democracy and women’s equality in all ways in society and the law as well as the laws of domestic violence made to protect western women from relationship abuse in particular.
Islam, now often referred to by Middle Eastern Scholars and Islam Experts such as Robert Spencer, and Walid Shoebat as the “Islamo-Fascist” geo-political, Arab expansionist religion, which was all encompassing of every facet of a human being’s life, it was being “sold” and whitewashed to the west as something that stood for an inner struggle, or the inner/lesser Jihad, and to the world as being a religion of peace, tolerance, and something not to be feared after all, despite their 1400 year, Koran ordered, eternal, declared war, on all non believers, or non-Muslims which are referred to in their Koran as “ Kuffars”.
Today words such as Jihad, Islamic Terrorists and linking the acts of Muslims to their religion, has been attacked by the political correct mobsters as being “racist “ or “bigotry” and not allowed.
In what world, do these political socio politically-correct fatally naïve politicians and their supporters really live in, I ask myself.
Not the same world, of truth and realty, it would seem.
Not when there has been literally thousands of terrorist attacks committed by Islamic people against non Islamic people throughout the entire world, since that fateful day on 911, 2001.
Yet, it would seem that Western Governments, under the influence of Muslim apologists and “useful idiots”, have been lulled into a “politically correct” denial of the reality, and truth of these attacks.
These post 911, thousands of genocidal murderous terrorist attacks, against non Muslims, by Muslims, through out the entire world. are what devout Muslims have committed, all the thousands of terrorist attacks against non Muslims have been carried out in the name of their God Allah and their religion called Islam.
The terrorists themselves in their own words, left behind in videotaped diatribes, their final wills and justification for murder, and claimed that they committed the Jihadist attacks against the west and non Muslims in strict adherence to the commands by Muhammad in the Koran.
For those whom do not know anything about Islam, Muhammad believed that the revelations to him which formed the Koran, were dictated to him, by an angel Gabriel from his god Allah, a God worshipped by his tribe, his pre deceased Father and Grandfather before him, in Mecca, in the middle east.
Muhammad is described in the Hadiths, as being rather fat, a very pale white skinned man with red hair, whom used henna frequently on his hair and beard. He also claimed that Abraham went to Mecca and built the Kabaah, the previous site of pagan worship in Makah, which had historically housed 360 pagan idols of Gods of the Arabian area.
Makkah, was a centre of commerce and pilgrimage, and earned a lot of money for merchants in the city now called Mecca, when the Pagan people would travel to Mecca and bring with them of course, trade and wealth to the Quaraish tribe of which Muhammad was member.
For those whom are not aware of the fact, the Hadiths is a collection of sayings and descriptions of what is claimed, Muhammad either said or did during his life, which were recorded after his death initially by “Bukhari” over 150 years after Muhammad’s death but are considered by most Muslims as the most authentic of all Hadiths..
In the Old Testament in the Holy Bible, Abraham fled to Hebron in Israel to leave Biblical Ur, in Iraq, an area of historically Pagan worship. It is claimed by many archaeologists that Ur was dedicated mainly to a pagan deity “Sin the Sun Goddess”, whom married “Allah” the Moon God, and had three daughters. (remember that Salman Rushdie , an ex Muslim and profound author and literary genius, was sentenced to death for daring to reveal about the Satanic Verses in the Koran, and write a fictional book based on those satanic verses in the Koran).
That death Fatwa by Ayatollah Khomeini , the fanatical and murderous Theocratic Shiite Clerical ruler in Iran, is still in place to this day and serves as a terrorist warning to all whom would dare to write on Islamic subjects if the clerics decide for some reason they do not like what has been written, truthful or otherwise.
It is Voltaire the French Philosopher whom wrote:
“Those who make you believe absurdities will also make you commit monstrosities. “
Voltaire
The entire right to freedom of speech is still endangered to this day, in the West, by such murderous threats by Islamic Clerics, whom wield enormous power over life and death, and whose reach is far beyond their Arabic lands.
These Theocrats are unelected by the general population, and are the real power in Iran, and Islamic nations, these same Theocratic representatives
Whom do not have a formal, world wide leadership hierarchy, for example as the Catholic Vatican. The fact that there is no real formal hierarchy makes it possible for Clerics to issue at will any religious decree which is binding on Muslims.
It is important to also note, that it is recorded in the Holy Bible, in the Old Testament, that Abraham left Ur and went to Hebron, with his entire family tribe, and there he died, in order to follow his God named El, known to Jewish people as Hashem and Christians as Yaweh.
The British, American and Australian Government’s since that genocidal madness of the attacks of 911, by Arabic Muslim men, the so called “Magnificent 19” , a term which is used on Al Jazeera, and Palestinian television, Jordan Television and Saudi television constantly, in fact, the entire Middle eastern television frequently, disregard all that has been learned from the attacks of 911 and the motivation of the Muslim terrorists which were the perpetrators of that act, still proclaim Islam as a religion of peace.
This statement, in itself, is something which cannot be taken as truth seriously, by those whom have truly studied the Koran and Hadiths, and have come away with a deeper understanding of the threat which is very real, and very immediate to Democracy, due to the intrinsic Islamic denial of the rights of the individual to freedom to choose, and in truth a threat to our very existence as a free, open and equality conscious civilization which is based in the use of science technology and logic.
The dualistic nature of Islam, is such, that when you study the Koran, and Hadiths, it is claimed by many apostates on such web sites as www.faithfreedom.org, that no modern logic or science, is actually found there, and most of it has been said by Critics of Islam, to be based it appears on myths and legends, in the Arabian area in the 6th century, and some, like the Buraq animal, half woman came directly from Zoastrian mythology.
The West allowed such unchecked migration, of people from historically an ideology which hates the western freedoms, women’s equality and ideals.
This was, until the western world shook in a collective horror and fear, witnessing the genocidal madness of the attacks by Arab devout Muslim men. These 19, mostly Saudi Arabian nations, devout Islamic adherents, attended local mosques in the USA,, it was later discovered, in the 911 report, that these men were mostly, in the USA on easily obtained, temporary student visas, and had arrived in USA, specifically to carry out the attacks. They had used the freedoms and the openness of the USA democracy in order to get into the USA, fraudulently committing taqqiyeh, intent to kill as many Americans as they could.
These terrorists lived in the USA posing as students, were chosen by Bin Laden and leaders of Al Qaida, and when the time came after planning and doing dry runs, carried out the Koranic religious call to violent jihad or what is called the Greater Jihad, during America’s September 11 terrorism- this was not by criminals, this act was carried out by Islamic adherents, whom hijacked planes, and murdered thousands of people.
This is the unpleasant, confronting and disturbing reality, of what those Islamic terrorists as devout Muslims, carried out, the practicing Taqqiyeh, ( the right to lie to non Muslims, and live in deceit) knowing they were going to die, and were to kill as many Kuffars ( non believers) as possible.
This religious Islamic ideology based, genocidal and evil attack, by Muslim Saudi Arabian men, in turn, affected directly many thousands of people more, bereaved families, emergency service workers, hospital workers, police and firemen whom bravely tried to save others, and in doing so, lost their own lives, every single person, whom went in to try to help save lives, they were all directly affected, to say nothing of those whom were bystanders, on-lookers through the use of mass media television and international broadcasts through out the western democracies.
Islam is a “real and present danger” to those who can see, and understand and recognize, the “wolves in sheep’s clothing” in the West, whom are not lulled into semi comatose naivety, by politically correct governments and media. Islam is an extreme religion, a serious, and very real danger, which poses a very real threat to the continuation of Western Democracy, and our individual constitutionally protected rights, which we women, our mothers, and grandmothers fought for.
Some of these hard won legislative women’s rights include the right to an abortion on demand, the right to refuse to marry and have children, if a woman should so choose, the right to have a career and advanced university based education.
Western women have rights which were desperately fought for, such as the right to freedom from patriarchal tyranny by family male members such as those faiths of a more Arabic tribal nature of power dynamics, the right to feminist ideals, to real and tangible full equality with men, and the right to choose our own destiny and be in total control over our own life.
In the West, modern well educated women cherish our rights, under the law, and under the various Western Constitution’s, and will not easily submit to an ideology of which vocal adherents to the Bronze Age Islamic Ideology seeks to remove those rights. Those whom would remove those essential and core Women’s Rights include the Patriarchal Imams’s such as Hilally, a Muslim non English speaking Cleric, based in New South Wales, at a Mosque even though he has lived in Australia over 25 years and refuses to learn English. Such Patriarchal Clerical devotees to a essentially established faith of the 6th century pan Arabic religion of Islam have been ridiculed by women and others, for his revolting remarks claiming that all women should be veiled and any unveiled women were like exposed meat. This caused a furor in Australia and overseas by women appalled that such a man would gain entry into Australia, let alone live in Australia over 35 years and refuse to learn English, the official language of Australia.
This showed an arrogant and total rejection of the Australian way of life and culture by an immigrant, especially the fact that he was an influential cleric is alarming.
Western women won the right to be equal. Western women won the right to demand not to be beaten, raped and murdered, by criminal men, and to not be blamed for being the victim -as what is the case for poor rape victims in Iran and other Arabic countries.
Those Islamic and non Islamic Rape Victims are hung, shot, or killed for being the victim, for it is seen by the extremely patriarchal culture of Islam, that any women whom is raped, it was their own fault for being there and not being accompanied by a male minder or protector. Again the dualistic nature of Islam is shown, by such callousness of opinion, and bizaare jurisprudence to blame a victim of a crime, for simply having been there, under Shariah laws, which is an extremely different belief, and absolutely unacceptable to a western democracy.
Then, in Iran, these innocent victims, they are killed for so called “acts against chastity”, which is ridiculous.
Western Women are raised in a western based democratic society, which values freedom of the individual, above all others, and whom live in a society which cherishes a wide range of women’s rights and freedoms.
They are very lucky indeed.
It is their “sisters” whom live under Islamic and Patriarchal domination and oppression, and control, which are the ones whom now, need to be liberated from tyranny.
Western women won the right to not be controlled by men, who dare to think that they own us or can use some theological madness, to deprive women of their rights and freedoms, under western democracy.
The separation of Church and State, for democracy, was a turning point in history, and allowed the West to truly move forward in a conscious manner, and become more humane and compassionate.
It also allowed women to be truly liberated from the tyranny of Patriarchal and Theocratic abuses in all is forms.
Once the Titular, and Theological rulers were removed from power over all society, that is when science, the arts and the rights of women truly advanced. Our western women’s right’s, is something which the western Governments and people, are collectively proud of, and also includes our open and free society, where the individual is respected, and individual right to choose ones life path is paramount.
Our hard won, western women’s right’s and freedoms, must be protected from those whom would use our open society and our voting rights in order to deprive us of the very same rights to vote, and live fulfilled and happy lives within our western democracies.
We as a en masse, collective, a “sisterhood” of women must protect these sacred rights, and save these women’s rights for our daughters and our granddaughters, and so forth,
This enemy which threatens all women’s rights and freedoms by theocratic means is the Islamic Theology.
Islam attracts mainly the disenfranchised, the poor, the angry, the naïve, the poorly educated in theology and the teachings of the Old Testament and the New Testaments, and those whom never bothered to study closely the life which Muhammad lived.
If they had closely studied the Koran , Hadiths, and the real history of Islam, including the documented and proven genocidal slaughter of over 60 million people in Islamic expansionist history, over the past 1400 years, would think twice about conversion to such a Bronze Age, tribal origin, Arabic, de- constructionist and gender reductionist war like theology, especially if one studies the actual events and acts carried out personally by Muhammad, and his devout followers, a specifically how badly he treated women, and how poorly his opinion of women was, they would further discover details of horrific actions and teachings during Muhammad’s life.
Muhammad, the often claimed, as an illiterate camel caravan trader, later war lord, and then self proclaimed Prophet of Islam, tried to re write his own version of Biblical History, teaching numerous incorrect references which were grossly inaccurate to the real Biblical history.
He claimed he was the last Prophet of his God Allah.
The Jews and Christians, who refused to convert to Muhammad’s religion, had only 3 options. Surrender to Muhammad and pay the Jizra or Infidel tax, convert or die.
Those same options are the only three available to the entire human race, and the non Muslim “ non believers” today, for the teachings of Muhammad are just as relevant and just as strict in the interpretation of them today, by the adherents of Islam, especially in the Middle East, and Africa and Asia, as they were 1400 years ago in history.
Nothing much in Islam Theology has changed in 1400 years. Especially I might add where the treatment of women in Islamic Theology and practice is concerned.
When studying the actual life of Muhammad and what actions he carried out, the special focus we need to study is Muhammad’s treatment of the Jews and Christians. Most refused to convert.
The Banu Qaraish Jewish Tribe, were slaughtered in mass murder, in one night, referred to as the “Battle of the Trench” in the Hadiths, including the Banu Quaraish tribe.
In a systematic genocide, Muhammad and his followers slaughtered one by one, some 800 men and boys and women whom had their throats cut and heads sliced off, one by one, in front of Muhammad, whilst he sat on a chair in front of the spectacle of mass killings, and Muhammad clapped and laughed.
The Jews and Christians refused to convert to this new religion of Muhammad’s, they truly proffered to die, rather than convert to his teachings, believing that Muhammad was not speaking for their God Yaweh or Hashem, when they cross checked his claims against their Holy Scriptures and decided that it was not correct what Muhammad was saying or preaching. They decided not to follow Muhammad, and decided he spoke for a completely different God entirely, named Allah, who the Jews and Christians decided, based on their profound knowledge and scholastic, mainly life long study of the Holy Bible New Testament and Old Testament, was not the same God of either the Jews or the Christians and so they became the victims of Muhammad’s anger and revengeful slaughter for daring to not believe his claims to Prophet-hood.
The same fate has happened to over 60 million souls it is estimated, whom have refused to convert to Islam, over the entire course of the last 1400 years and died for daring not to convert to Islam. This is historical fact.
Hence the reason Muhammad became enraged, that the Jews and Christians stuck together, they would not follow him, and when he went to Medina, this is where the later Koranic Surah’s (mostly the Chapter 9 The Sword) were revealed.It is the violent and revengeful Medina Suarahs of Chapter 9 of the Koran, which spoke of eternal war against them who were refusing to convert, the non believers, and Muhammad called Jews and Christians “apes , monkeys and pigs”, were given to him by the Angel he believed was named Gabriel. These teachings today are valid to Muslims, and are just as real, and just as God given, they believe, today as they were 1400 years ago.
The teachings of Muhammad and Islam are in direct opposition to the teachings of Jesus Christ, and Judaism, in fact the sheer number of theological and distinct inaccuracies and historical errors where he referred to events and characters in the Holy Bible, completely out of time and events, was why the Jews and Christians earne3d his wrath for not converting.
It raises the question, and it has to be asked of Islamic adherents, then why it is considered that Muhammad was the best example of a man in history by his followers.
There are estimated to be a billion of Islamic adherents in the world today.
Muhammad’s teachings on women are still used to oppress and control women in Arabic and Muslim societies as well as Muslim families adhere to this teachings here in the West.
Muhammad was a man whom had such a demonstrably low opinion of women, it is his teachings about women in the Koran and Hadiths which are used in this very day and age still. These Islamic teachings about women, are still used today to oppress, control, terrify and haunt women.
The barbarism of Female Circumcise ( Female Genital Mutilation) and Infundibulate women as babies and children mostly and, they are used to justify “honour killings” which is the murder of women which their families have decided to kill -because they have offended, or been seen to offend, their tribal sense of family honor.
These horrific and unjustifiable murders of innocent women are growing in numbers, as the immigration of Muslims to the west increase.
What is horrific to the western civilization is common in the Middle Eastern countries, and reportedly in African Islamic countries, “honor Killings” occur frequently in Islamic families, even in Australia, America and UK, where Islamic migrants have gone seeking a better economic life. Newspapers report such killings with sad repetitiveness.
Mass immigration by increasing number of Islamic adherents has seen documented by various government and police agencies, as perhaps contributing to the increasing” honor killings” today.
The Hadiths, which are reportedly, the sayings and actions of Muhammad, which allows and calls for female circumcision of all women to maintain chastity, are often carried out in secret by women themselves against female children, illegally or the female children are taken overseas, to undergo this traumatic and life threatening horrific abuse.
Islam is a threat to every western woman. Do not doubt it for one moment.
Indeed, the rising numbers of women converts to Islam and the marriage of western women to Muslim men is a trend which is very disturbing considering the lack of full comprehension by women converts what it is that they are actually getting into when they marry a Muslim man and become Muslim adherents. These women need to do a great deal of independent study of the sayings of Muhammad and his life actions as well
as the Shariah laws which control the custody of any children of such a marriage, and the fact that there is no choice of the children, whether or not they are Islamic, if they have a Muslim parent, they automatically are considered Muslims.
If they leave Islam they are killed as Apostates. An apostate has 3 days to return to Islam or be killed. That is the law of Islam -no one ever gets out of Islam alive. It prevents anyone ever having the freedom to choose which religion one wishes to be.
What is a very real concern, to many western people, especially in Political Parties, such as in Denmark and UK, is the mass building of new mosques in the west, that is being allowed to continue vastly unchecked by western governments, with no right whatsoever of reciprocity, by Muslim countries, to the Christians and Jews to build Churches and Synagogues.
Women must worship in areas apart from Islamic men, unlike in Christian and Jewish faiths where families pray and worship together, in Islam women are sent to pray separate from men behind veils or screen or curtains, hidden away as if they are in some way shameful and needing to not be seen.
In Islam, there are many Koranic Surah’s or verses, which teach the hatred of Jews and Christians, and such a poor opinion of women, if one should get hold of a copy and actually study the Koran. Indeed many countries which are Islamic ban entry into their country of any Jewish person which is unbelievable in this modern era such anti-semetism still runs rampant in the middle east, through both propaganda and the deliberate building of thousands of mosques through out Europe Asia, and Australia, America and allies.
Women in the West need to realize that our very core rights are potentially at risk in the next generation by adherents to the faith of Islam. Women need to teach their daughters well, to respect and appreciate how good the western women have got it in terms of quality of their life, when compared to women in the Middle East and Africa and any Islamic nation. It is for our forgotten sisters in Islamic lands we must remember to strive to keep all our freedoms and rights, to inspire our sisters in the Islamic lands to start to protest and voice their opposition to the way that women are treated within their Islamic lands.
The End.
To Western Women
and Men.
By Tess McNamara
B.A. Women’s Studies
B.A. Family Studies.
In the past thirty years, a relatively unknown phenomenon has been happening by stealth, largely unnoticed by the general population until it was too late to protest, and by complicit western government’s support and encouragement, which was the immigration by Muslim men and women to the west, numbering in the post 70’s to the multi- millions- currently over 57 million Muslims in Europe alone.
With this came many social problems facing the west, of social discord between people of the opposing faiths, demands by Muslims for special privileges and special status, and governments appear unable and unwilling to make any decisions to solve the problems inherent with a culture and ideology which is antagonistic to the western ideals of freedoms, democracy and women’s equality in all ways in society and the law as well as the laws of domestic violence made to protect western women from relationship abuse in particular.
Islam, now often referred to by Middle Eastern Scholars and Islam Experts such as Robert Spencer, and Walid Shoebat as the “Islamo-Fascist” geo-political, Arab expansionist religion, which was all encompassing of every facet of a human being’s life, it was being “sold” and whitewashed to the west as something that stood for an inner struggle, or the inner/lesser Jihad, and to the world as being a religion of peace, tolerance, and something not to be feared after all, despite their 1400 year, Koran ordered, eternal, declared war, on all non believers, or non-Muslims which are referred to in their Koran as “ Kuffars”.
Today words such as Jihad, Islamic Terrorists and linking the acts of Muslims to their religion, has been attacked by the political correct mobsters as being “racist “ or “bigotry” and not allowed.
In what world, do these political socio politically-correct fatally naïve politicians and their supporters really live in, I ask myself.
Not the same world, of truth and realty, it would seem.
Not when there has been literally thousands of terrorist attacks committed by Islamic people against non Islamic people throughout the entire world, since that fateful day on 911, 2001.
Yet, it would seem that Western Governments, under the influence of Muslim apologists and “useful idiots”, have been lulled into a “politically correct” denial of the reality, and truth of these attacks.
These post 911, thousands of genocidal murderous terrorist attacks, against non Muslims, by Muslims, through out the entire world. are what devout Muslims have committed, all the thousands of terrorist attacks against non Muslims have been carried out in the name of their God Allah and their religion called Islam.
The terrorists themselves in their own words, left behind in videotaped diatribes, their final wills and justification for murder, and claimed that they committed the Jihadist attacks against the west and non Muslims in strict adherence to the commands by Muhammad in the Koran.
For those whom do not know anything about Islam, Muhammad believed that the revelations to him which formed the Koran, were dictated to him, by an angel Gabriel from his god Allah, a God worshipped by his tribe, his pre deceased Father and Grandfather before him, in Mecca, in the middle east.
Muhammad is described in the Hadiths, as being rather fat, a very pale white skinned man with red hair, whom used henna frequently on his hair and beard. He also claimed that Abraham went to Mecca and built the Kabaah, the previous site of pagan worship in Makah, which had historically housed 360 pagan idols of Gods of the Arabian area.
Makkah, was a centre of commerce and pilgrimage, and earned a lot of money for merchants in the city now called Mecca, when the Pagan people would travel to Mecca and bring with them of course, trade and wealth to the Quaraish tribe of which Muhammad was member.
For those whom are not aware of the fact, the Hadiths is a collection of sayings and descriptions of what is claimed, Muhammad either said or did during his life, which were recorded after his death initially by “Bukhari” over 150 years after Muhammad’s death but are considered by most Muslims as the most authentic of all Hadiths..
In the Old Testament in the Holy Bible, Abraham fled to Hebron in Israel to leave Biblical Ur, in Iraq, an area of historically Pagan worship. It is claimed by many archaeologists that Ur was dedicated mainly to a pagan deity “Sin the Sun Goddess”, whom married “Allah” the Moon God, and had three daughters. (remember that Salman Rushdie , an ex Muslim and profound author and literary genius, was sentenced to death for daring to reveal about the Satanic Verses in the Koran, and write a fictional book based on those satanic verses in the Koran).
That death Fatwa by Ayatollah Khomeini , the fanatical and murderous Theocratic Shiite Clerical ruler in Iran, is still in place to this day and serves as a terrorist warning to all whom would dare to write on Islamic subjects if the clerics decide for some reason they do not like what has been written, truthful or otherwise.
It is Voltaire the French Philosopher whom wrote:
“Those who make you believe absurdities will also make you commit monstrosities. “
Voltaire
The entire right to freedom of speech is still endangered to this day, in the West, by such murderous threats by Islamic Clerics, whom wield enormous power over life and death, and whose reach is far beyond their Arabic lands.
These Theocrats are unelected by the general population, and are the real power in Iran, and Islamic nations, these same Theocratic representatives
Whom do not have a formal, world wide leadership hierarchy, for example as the Catholic Vatican. The fact that there is no real formal hierarchy makes it possible for Clerics to issue at will any religious decree which is binding on Muslims.
It is important to also note, that it is recorded in the Holy Bible, in the Old Testament, that Abraham left Ur and went to Hebron, with his entire family tribe, and there he died, in order to follow his God named El, known to Jewish people as Hashem and Christians as Yaweh.
The British, American and Australian Government’s since that genocidal madness of the attacks of 911, by Arabic Muslim men, the so called “Magnificent 19” , a term which is used on Al Jazeera, and Palestinian television, Jordan Television and Saudi television constantly, in fact, the entire Middle eastern television frequently, disregard all that has been learned from the attacks of 911 and the motivation of the Muslim terrorists which were the perpetrators of that act, still proclaim Islam as a religion of peace.
This statement, in itself, is something which cannot be taken as truth seriously, by those whom have truly studied the Koran and Hadiths, and have come away with a deeper understanding of the threat which is very real, and very immediate to Democracy, due to the intrinsic Islamic denial of the rights of the individual to freedom to choose, and in truth a threat to our very existence as a free, open and equality conscious civilization which is based in the use of science technology and logic.
The dualistic nature of Islam, is such, that when you study the Koran, and Hadiths, it is claimed by many apostates on such web sites as www.faithfreedom.org, that no modern logic or science, is actually found there, and most of it has been said by Critics of Islam, to be based it appears on myths and legends, in the Arabian area in the 6th century, and some, like the Buraq animal, half woman came directly from Zoastrian mythology.
The West allowed such unchecked migration, of people from historically an ideology which hates the western freedoms, women’s equality and ideals.
This was, until the western world shook in a collective horror and fear, witnessing the genocidal madness of the attacks by Arab devout Muslim men. These 19, mostly Saudi Arabian nations, devout Islamic adherents, attended local mosques in the USA,, it was later discovered, in the 911 report, that these men were mostly, in the USA on easily obtained, temporary student visas, and had arrived in USA, specifically to carry out the attacks. They had used the freedoms and the openness of the USA democracy in order to get into the USA, fraudulently committing taqqiyeh, intent to kill as many Americans as they could.
These terrorists lived in the USA posing as students, were chosen by Bin Laden and leaders of Al Qaida, and when the time came after planning and doing dry runs, carried out the Koranic religious call to violent jihad or what is called the Greater Jihad, during America’s September 11 terrorism- this was not by criminals, this act was carried out by Islamic adherents, whom hijacked planes, and murdered thousands of people.
This is the unpleasant, confronting and disturbing reality, of what those Islamic terrorists as devout Muslims, carried out, the practicing Taqqiyeh, ( the right to lie to non Muslims, and live in deceit) knowing they were going to die, and were to kill as many Kuffars ( non believers) as possible.
This religious Islamic ideology based, genocidal and evil attack, by Muslim Saudi Arabian men, in turn, affected directly many thousands of people more, bereaved families, emergency service workers, hospital workers, police and firemen whom bravely tried to save others, and in doing so, lost their own lives, every single person, whom went in to try to help save lives, they were all directly affected, to say nothing of those whom were bystanders, on-lookers through the use of mass media television and international broadcasts through out the western democracies.
Islam is a “real and present danger” to those who can see, and understand and recognize, the “wolves in sheep’s clothing” in the West, whom are not lulled into semi comatose naivety, by politically correct governments and media. Islam is an extreme religion, a serious, and very real danger, which poses a very real threat to the continuation of Western Democracy, and our individual constitutionally protected rights, which we women, our mothers, and grandmothers fought for.
Some of these hard won legislative women’s rights include the right to an abortion on demand, the right to refuse to marry and have children, if a woman should so choose, the right to have a career and advanced university based education.
Western women have rights which were desperately fought for, such as the right to freedom from patriarchal tyranny by family male members such as those faiths of a more Arabic tribal nature of power dynamics, the right to feminist ideals, to real and tangible full equality with men, and the right to choose our own destiny and be in total control over our own life.
In the West, modern well educated women cherish our rights, under the law, and under the various Western Constitution’s, and will not easily submit to an ideology of which vocal adherents to the Bronze Age Islamic Ideology seeks to remove those rights. Those whom would remove those essential and core Women’s Rights include the Patriarchal Imams’s such as Hilally, a Muslim non English speaking Cleric, based in New South Wales, at a Mosque even though he has lived in Australia over 25 years and refuses to learn English. Such Patriarchal Clerical devotees to a essentially established faith of the 6th century pan Arabic religion of Islam have been ridiculed by women and others, for his revolting remarks claiming that all women should be veiled and any unveiled women were like exposed meat. This caused a furor in Australia and overseas by women appalled that such a man would gain entry into Australia, let alone live in Australia over 35 years and refuse to learn English, the official language of Australia.
This showed an arrogant and total rejection of the Australian way of life and culture by an immigrant, especially the fact that he was an influential cleric is alarming.
Western women won the right to be equal. Western women won the right to demand not to be beaten, raped and murdered, by criminal men, and to not be blamed for being the victim -as what is the case for poor rape victims in Iran and other Arabic countries.
Those Islamic and non Islamic Rape Victims are hung, shot, or killed for being the victim, for it is seen by the extremely patriarchal culture of Islam, that any women whom is raped, it was their own fault for being there and not being accompanied by a male minder or protector. Again the dualistic nature of Islam is shown, by such callousness of opinion, and bizaare jurisprudence to blame a victim of a crime, for simply having been there, under Shariah laws, which is an extremely different belief, and absolutely unacceptable to a western democracy.
Then, in Iran, these innocent victims, they are killed for so called “acts against chastity”, which is ridiculous.
Western Women are raised in a western based democratic society, which values freedom of the individual, above all others, and whom live in a society which cherishes a wide range of women’s rights and freedoms.
They are very lucky indeed.
It is their “sisters” whom live under Islamic and Patriarchal domination and oppression, and control, which are the ones whom now, need to be liberated from tyranny.
Western women won the right to not be controlled by men, who dare to think that they own us or can use some theological madness, to deprive women of their rights and freedoms, under western democracy.
The separation of Church and State, for democracy, was a turning point in history, and allowed the West to truly move forward in a conscious manner, and become more humane and compassionate.
It also allowed women to be truly liberated from the tyranny of Patriarchal and Theocratic abuses in all is forms.
Once the Titular, and Theological rulers were removed from power over all society, that is when science, the arts and the rights of women truly advanced. Our western women’s right’s, is something which the western Governments and people, are collectively proud of, and also includes our open and free society, where the individual is respected, and individual right to choose ones life path is paramount.
Our hard won, western women’s right’s and freedoms, must be protected from those whom would use our open society and our voting rights in order to deprive us of the very same rights to vote, and live fulfilled and happy lives within our western democracies.
We as a en masse, collective, a “sisterhood” of women must protect these sacred rights, and save these women’s rights for our daughters and our granddaughters, and so forth,
This enemy which threatens all women’s rights and freedoms by theocratic means is the Islamic Theology.
Islam attracts mainly the disenfranchised, the poor, the angry, the naïve, the poorly educated in theology and the teachings of the Old Testament and the New Testaments, and those whom never bothered to study closely the life which Muhammad lived.
If they had closely studied the Koran , Hadiths, and the real history of Islam, including the documented and proven genocidal slaughter of over 60 million people in Islamic expansionist history, over the past 1400 years, would think twice about conversion to such a Bronze Age, tribal origin, Arabic, de- constructionist and gender reductionist war like theology, especially if one studies the actual events and acts carried out personally by Muhammad, and his devout followers, a specifically how badly he treated women, and how poorly his opinion of women was, they would further discover details of horrific actions and teachings during Muhammad’s life.
Muhammad, the often claimed, as an illiterate camel caravan trader, later war lord, and then self proclaimed Prophet of Islam, tried to re write his own version of Biblical History, teaching numerous incorrect references which were grossly inaccurate to the real Biblical history.
He claimed he was the last Prophet of his God Allah.
The Jews and Christians, who refused to convert to Muhammad’s religion, had only 3 options. Surrender to Muhammad and pay the Jizra or Infidel tax, convert or die.
Those same options are the only three available to the entire human race, and the non Muslim “ non believers” today, for the teachings of Muhammad are just as relevant and just as strict in the interpretation of them today, by the adherents of Islam, especially in the Middle East, and Africa and Asia, as they were 1400 years ago in history.
Nothing much in Islam Theology has changed in 1400 years. Especially I might add where the treatment of women in Islamic Theology and practice is concerned.
When studying the actual life of Muhammad and what actions he carried out, the special focus we need to study is Muhammad’s treatment of the Jews and Christians. Most refused to convert.
The Banu Qaraish Jewish Tribe, were slaughtered in mass murder, in one night, referred to as the “Battle of the Trench” in the Hadiths, including the Banu Quaraish tribe.
In a systematic genocide, Muhammad and his followers slaughtered one by one, some 800 men and boys and women whom had their throats cut and heads sliced off, one by one, in front of Muhammad, whilst he sat on a chair in front of the spectacle of mass killings, and Muhammad clapped and laughed.
The Jews and Christians refused to convert to this new religion of Muhammad’s, they truly proffered to die, rather than convert to his teachings, believing that Muhammad was not speaking for their God Yaweh or Hashem, when they cross checked his claims against their Holy Scriptures and decided that it was not correct what Muhammad was saying or preaching. They decided not to follow Muhammad, and decided he spoke for a completely different God entirely, named Allah, who the Jews and Christians decided, based on their profound knowledge and scholastic, mainly life long study of the Holy Bible New Testament and Old Testament, was not the same God of either the Jews or the Christians and so they became the victims of Muhammad’s anger and revengeful slaughter for daring to not believe his claims to Prophet-hood.
The same fate has happened to over 60 million souls it is estimated, whom have refused to convert to Islam, over the entire course of the last 1400 years and died for daring not to convert to Islam. This is historical fact.
Hence the reason Muhammad became enraged, that the Jews and Christians stuck together, they would not follow him, and when he went to Medina, this is where the later Koranic Surah’s (mostly the Chapter 9 The Sword) were revealed.It is the violent and revengeful Medina Suarahs of Chapter 9 of the Koran, which spoke of eternal war against them who were refusing to convert, the non believers, and Muhammad called Jews and Christians “apes , monkeys and pigs”, were given to him by the Angel he believed was named Gabriel. These teachings today are valid to Muslims, and are just as real, and just as God given, they believe, today as they were 1400 years ago.
The teachings of Muhammad and Islam are in direct opposition to the teachings of Jesus Christ, and Judaism, in fact the sheer number of theological and distinct inaccuracies and historical errors where he referred to events and characters in the Holy Bible, completely out of time and events, was why the Jews and Christians earne3d his wrath for not converting.
It raises the question, and it has to be asked of Islamic adherents, then why it is considered that Muhammad was the best example of a man in history by his followers.
There are estimated to be a billion of Islamic adherents in the world today.
Muhammad’s teachings on women are still used to oppress and control women in Arabic and Muslim societies as well as Muslim families adhere to this teachings here in the West.
Muhammad was a man whom had such a demonstrably low opinion of women, it is his teachings about women in the Koran and Hadiths which are used in this very day and age still. These Islamic teachings about women, are still used today to oppress, control, terrify and haunt women.
The barbarism of Female Circumcise ( Female Genital Mutilation) and Infundibulate women as babies and children mostly and, they are used to justify “honour killings” which is the murder of women which their families have decided to kill -because they have offended, or been seen to offend, their tribal sense of family honor.
These horrific and unjustifiable murders of innocent women are growing in numbers, as the immigration of Muslims to the west increase.
What is horrific to the western civilization is common in the Middle Eastern countries, and reportedly in African Islamic countries, “honor Killings” occur frequently in Islamic families, even in Australia, America and UK, where Islamic migrants have gone seeking a better economic life. Newspapers report such killings with sad repetitiveness.
Mass immigration by increasing number of Islamic adherents has seen documented by various government and police agencies, as perhaps contributing to the increasing” honor killings” today.
The Hadiths, which are reportedly, the sayings and actions of Muhammad, which allows and calls for female circumcision of all women to maintain chastity, are often carried out in secret by women themselves against female children, illegally or the female children are taken overseas, to undergo this traumatic and life threatening horrific abuse.
Islam is a threat to every western woman. Do not doubt it for one moment.
Indeed, the rising numbers of women converts to Islam and the marriage of western women to Muslim men is a trend which is very disturbing considering the lack of full comprehension by women converts what it is that they are actually getting into when they marry a Muslim man and become Muslim adherents. These women need to do a great deal of independent study of the sayings of Muhammad and his life actions as well
as the Shariah laws which control the custody of any children of such a marriage, and the fact that there is no choice of the children, whether or not they are Islamic, if they have a Muslim parent, they automatically are considered Muslims.
If they leave Islam they are killed as Apostates. An apostate has 3 days to return to Islam or be killed. That is the law of Islam -no one ever gets out of Islam alive. It prevents anyone ever having the freedom to choose which religion one wishes to be.
What is a very real concern, to many western people, especially in Political Parties, such as in Denmark and UK, is the mass building of new mosques in the west, that is being allowed to continue vastly unchecked by western governments, with no right whatsoever of reciprocity, by Muslim countries, to the Christians and Jews to build Churches and Synagogues.
Women must worship in areas apart from Islamic men, unlike in Christian and Jewish faiths where families pray and worship together, in Islam women are sent to pray separate from men behind veils or screen or curtains, hidden away as if they are in some way shameful and needing to not be seen.
In Islam, there are many Koranic Surah’s or verses, which teach the hatred of Jews and Christians, and such a poor opinion of women, if one should get hold of a copy and actually study the Koran. Indeed many countries which are Islamic ban entry into their country of any Jewish person which is unbelievable in this modern era such anti-semetism still runs rampant in the middle east, through both propaganda and the deliberate building of thousands of mosques through out Europe Asia, and Australia, America and allies.
Women in the West need to realize that our very core rights are potentially at risk in the next generation by adherents to the faith of Islam. Women need to teach their daughters well, to respect and appreciate how good the western women have got it in terms of quality of their life, when compared to women in the Middle East and Africa and any Islamic nation. It is for our forgotten sisters in Islamic lands we must remember to strive to keep all our freedoms and rights, to inspire our sisters in the Islamic lands to start to protest and voice their opposition to the way that women are treated within their Islamic lands.
The End.
Why long term peace cannot be achieved in Israel between Jews and Palestinians.
By Tess McNamara
Whilst many desperately wish to believe that peace can be achieved permanently in Israel, and binding agreements struck between the Palestinians and Jews of Israel, the writer has grave doubts that this is possible until the Government of Israel changes its own Modus Operandi and undertakes a far more realistic position concerning its historical enemy, the Hamas, Fatah, Hezbollah and other elements of radicalization between Islamism’s in Palestinian territories.
In order to ascertain the likelihood of any such peace agreement lasting between current bitter enemies Palestinian Arabs and Israel’s Jewish people, we need to look back into the past in order to see what mind frame, what the hearts of each tell us.
We need to clinically and unemotionally assess each side of the bargaining, what each side has said to its own people, verses perhaps what they have stated in media and gullible international community, and what steps each side have taken to meet its international obligations and its obligations to the participants of the so called road map to peace.
Let us look first to the Palestinians whom signed under much media applause and fanfare the Oslo Accords. According to the online “Wikipedia ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo_Accords
“The Oslo Accords, officially called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements or Declaration of Principles (DOP) was a milestone in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It was the first direct, face-to-face agreement between Israel and political representatives of Palestinians. It was the first time that some Palestinian factions publicly acknowledged Israel's right to exist. It was intended to be a framework for the future relations between Israel and the anticipated Palestinian state, when all outstanding final status issues between the two states would be addressed and resolved in one agreement. The Accords were finalized in Oslo, Norway on 20 August 1993, and subsequently officially signed at a public ceremony in Washington D.C. on 13 September 1993, with Yasser Arafat signing for the Palestine Liberation Organization and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin signing for the State of Israel. It was witnessed by Warren Christopher for the United States and Andrei Kozyrev for Russia, in the presence of US President Bill Clinton.”
Not very hard to understand really, it states that it really was all so very civilized and the major obstacles would be cleared away. Unfortunately despite the “kumbayahs” and the positive myths it created internationally, peace was ever further from eventuation.
Dr Dr. Tirza Hechter , in,” “Peace Talks, What Do They Mean? Realism and Constructivism in Yasser Arafat's public Statements Following the Oslo Accords (1994-1995)” pointed out very clearly that the meaning of what was being signed was dramatically different between the signing parties in their intent to ensure that they abided by the agreement. The public statements by Arafat in the twelve months post signing of the Oslo Agreement was in direct contradiction of what he had stated in English to the media. He states, ”A critical evaluation of Arafat's public statements during the first year since his return to Gaza (1/7/1994-30/6/1995) confirms the historical value of this event as a breakthrough in the perceptions of both the Israelis and the Palestinians, but also refutes, in certain ways, this perception of reality.”
In other words, the public face which Arafat showed to the Western Leaders and the Media was the opposite of what he had said to his own people. He did this in order to ensure that the money flow would continue to come to the Palestinians leadership. We now know from what has been shown by media and government sources, and events that transpired from this time, that the overseas donors money never made it to the people, but was misappropriated and diverted into Arafat’s own accounts and went to fund continuing terrorist activities and bloodshed of the innocent Jewish people.
It was in 1959, October 10, 1959, that a group of Arab men met in Kuwait, including Arafat, and established the Terrorist Organization Fatah in order to promote the genocide and destruction of the Jews and the State of Israel.
Later, it was in 1964, that the Terrorist Organization, the infamous PLO was established in order for Arafat to further his agenda to destroy the Nation of Israel and slaughter the Jews. It was from 1968 Arafat managed to become its leader of this virulent anti-Semitic murderous terrorist organization and from then onwards was called “The Chairman”, as he had become known, as the leader.
It was Arafat whom with the “Fedayeen”, attacked and murdered in cold blood, the slaughtered Israeli competitor athletes in Berlin at the 1972 Munich Olympics , “The Black September”.
One must remember that Arafat never spent time in jail for this mass murder of innocent Jewish people. At the online sourced website, http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1991to_now_plo_arafat.php
It clearly states the following in regards to Arafat and the PLO,
“In case there was any doubt about the PLO policy toward Israel, the Covenant states:
The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of the state of Israel are entirely illegal, regardless of the passage of time ...
Article 20: The Balfour Declaration, the Mandate for Palestine, and everything that has been based upon them, are deemed null and void. Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history and the true conception of what constitutes statehood. Judaism, being a religion, is not an independent nationality. Nor do Jews constitute a single nation with an identity of its own; they are citizens of the states to which they belong.
And a few words about Zionism:
Article 22: Zionism is a political movement organically associated with international imperialism and antagonistic to all action for liberation and to progressive movements in the world. It is racist and fanatic in its nature, aggressive, expansionist, and colonial in its aims, and fascist in its methods. Israel is the instrument of the Zionist movement, and geographical base for world imperialism placed strategically in the midst of the Arab homeland to combat the hopes of the Arab nation for liberation, unity, and progress. Israel is a constant source of threat vis-a-vis peace in the Middle East and the whole world.
Article 23: The demand of security and peace, as well as the demand of right and justice, require all states to consider Zionism an illegitimate movement, to outlaw its existence, and to ban its operations, in order that friendly relations among peoples may be preserved, and the loyalty of citizens to their respective homelands safeguarded.
In other words this PLO Terrorist Organization, had been set up to destroy, to deal with the Jews on its own terms, despite lacking validity to its claims that the State of Israel had no legitimacy or legality, despite the factual historical truth of the establishment of Israel- was that it was voted on and agreed to by the League of Nations. Israel has every right to exist, and in actual fact was established much the same way as Saudi Arabia, Trans Jordan (which was established as the Palestinian Homeland)”, and other Middle East countries after the carve up of the Ottoman Empire. A little thing called facts which the self named Arab Palestinians like to ignore and the slick propaganda by them ignore also.
The online website also states:
“At a 1974 meeting in Cairo, the Palestinian National Council adopted a "phased plan" to eliminate Israel that sought to establish some territory under Palestinian control and then use that as leverage to continue to fight and ultimately to have an all-out war that would destroy Israel forever.”
It clearly has succeeded in this phase under its covenant to achieve control of the disputed territories, and as history has seen, has not ceased to wage a constant warfare against Israel, allowing its land to be used to wage missile rocket attacks with increasing sophistication, and psychological warfare against the Jewish people themselves using historical revisionism to weaken the will of the elected government of Israel itself to have the will to defend the State of Israel from being further carved into smaller and smaller pieces so that it can not ever survive the enemies which surround them on any level either militaristically from any attacks, nor from the de legitimization of Israel by the self proclaimed Arab Palestinians.
Unless there is a change of government of Israel, and a future Government of Israel has the courage and intestinal fortitude and courage, to say no more to further dismemberment of the Sovereign and God given State of Israel’s land mass, ( 75 per cent less than what they had been promised by the deceptive British) Israel and its people, are at serious threat of a new Holocaust being directed to the entire Jewish people, economically, demographically psychologically and in reality through continuing use of terror.
The Government of Israel must learn from its mistakes and no longer agree to trade land for peace which has been constantly promised and never delivered. The Government of Israel must learn from the past and re direct itself and its resources to defend the entire State of Israel against its enemies, deport all known terrorists, terrorist sympathizers’, ban all Palestinians from the Knesset and revoke all citizenship from all Palestinian persons and force them to leave Israel in total, as the Jews were forced to do so by Arab nations prior to the invasion and attacks by the Arab neighbors upon the establishment of Israel in 1948. They must for the sake of the Jewish nations survival against enemies which have never, and will never stop attacking Israel until it is destroyed, refuse to submit to the terrorists, in cowering fear of what they might do if their demands are not met and instead deal with the terrorists themselves and not rely of empty promises of Saudis, Usa and so on.
The Government of Israel must learn from Islamic law that no peace agreement can ever exceed 10 years, and any peace signed is only ever temporary. So rather than appease and capitulate in fear to threats by murderous self destructive death glorifying culture at its gates, it must first defend its own culture and lives to ensure its own people are protected. To date not one member of the Israeli Government has achieved this.’
As predicted by the Bible, Israel is surrounded at its borders by enemies all around. Will the Government of Israel capitulate and allow the genocide of its own people when it can prevent this by refusing to further participate in any carving up of Israel and expel the enemies within to other Arab nations to their Islamic Umma to support. This action by the Jewish nation is not without precedence from its Arab nation enemies and neighbors whom did the very same thing to the Jews.
Has the Government of Israel got the courage to defend its own people and nation from destruction which otherwise is inevitable?. Will it be able to face God in the future and admit that the mistakes it makes as appeasement continues, was a mistake at all?.
Israel stands on teh brink of its very own destruction and has failed the propaganda war, it does not have to prove its legitimacy - it already was for 60 years under teh United Nations, and frnakly why does Israel care what the world thinks?
By Tess McNamara
Whilst many desperately wish to believe that peace can be achieved permanently in Israel, and binding agreements struck between the Palestinians and Jews of Israel, the writer has grave doubts that this is possible until the Government of Israel changes its own Modus Operandi and undertakes a far more realistic position concerning its historical enemy, the Hamas, Fatah, Hezbollah and other elements of radicalization between Islamism’s in Palestinian territories.
In order to ascertain the likelihood of any such peace agreement lasting between current bitter enemies Palestinian Arabs and Israel’s Jewish people, we need to look back into the past in order to see what mind frame, what the hearts of each tell us.
We need to clinically and unemotionally assess each side of the bargaining, what each side has said to its own people, verses perhaps what they have stated in media and gullible international community, and what steps each side have taken to meet its international obligations and its obligations to the participants of the so called road map to peace.
Let us look first to the Palestinians whom signed under much media applause and fanfare the Oslo Accords. According to the online “Wikipedia ,http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oslo_Accords
“The Oslo Accords, officially called the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangements or Declaration of Principles (DOP) was a milestone in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It was the first direct, face-to-face agreement between Israel and political representatives of Palestinians. It was the first time that some Palestinian factions publicly acknowledged Israel's right to exist. It was intended to be a framework for the future relations between Israel and the anticipated Palestinian state, when all outstanding final status issues between the two states would be addressed and resolved in one agreement. The Accords were finalized in Oslo, Norway on 20 August 1993, and subsequently officially signed at a public ceremony in Washington D.C. on 13 September 1993, with Yasser Arafat signing for the Palestine Liberation Organization and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin signing for the State of Israel. It was witnessed by Warren Christopher for the United States and Andrei Kozyrev for Russia, in the presence of US President Bill Clinton.”
Not very hard to understand really, it states that it really was all so very civilized and the major obstacles would be cleared away. Unfortunately despite the “kumbayahs” and the positive myths it created internationally, peace was ever further from eventuation.
Dr Dr. Tirza Hechter , in,” “Peace Talks, What Do They Mean? Realism and Constructivism in Yasser Arafat's public Statements Following the Oslo Accords (1994-1995)” pointed out very clearly that the meaning of what was being signed was dramatically different between the signing parties in their intent to ensure that they abided by the agreement. The public statements by Arafat in the twelve months post signing of the Oslo Agreement was in direct contradiction of what he had stated in English to the media. He states, ”A critical evaluation of Arafat's public statements during the first year since his return to Gaza (1/7/1994-30/6/1995) confirms the historical value of this event as a breakthrough in the perceptions of both the Israelis and the Palestinians, but also refutes, in certain ways, this perception of reality.”
In other words, the public face which Arafat showed to the Western Leaders and the Media was the opposite of what he had said to his own people. He did this in order to ensure that the money flow would continue to come to the Palestinians leadership. We now know from what has been shown by media and government sources, and events that transpired from this time, that the overseas donors money never made it to the people, but was misappropriated and diverted into Arafat’s own accounts and went to fund continuing terrorist activities and bloodshed of the innocent Jewish people.
It was in 1959, October 10, 1959, that a group of Arab men met in Kuwait, including Arafat, and established the Terrorist Organization Fatah in order to promote the genocide and destruction of the Jews and the State of Israel.
Later, it was in 1964, that the Terrorist Organization, the infamous PLO was established in order for Arafat to further his agenda to destroy the Nation of Israel and slaughter the Jews. It was from 1968 Arafat managed to become its leader of this virulent anti-Semitic murderous terrorist organization and from then onwards was called “The Chairman”, as he had become known, as the leader.
It was Arafat whom with the “Fedayeen”, attacked and murdered in cold blood, the slaughtered Israeli competitor athletes in Berlin at the 1972 Munich Olympics , “The Black September”.
One must remember that Arafat never spent time in jail for this mass murder of innocent Jewish people. At the online sourced website, http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_1991to_now_plo_arafat.php
It clearly states the following in regards to Arafat and the PLO,
“In case there was any doubt about the PLO policy toward Israel, the Covenant states:
The partition of Palestine in 1947 and the establishment of the state of Israel are entirely illegal, regardless of the passage of time ...
Article 20: The Balfour Declaration, the Mandate for Palestine, and everything that has been based upon them, are deemed null and void. Claims of historical or religious ties of Jews with Palestine are incompatible with the facts of history and the true conception of what constitutes statehood. Judaism, being a religion, is not an independent nationality. Nor do Jews constitute a single nation with an identity of its own; they are citizens of the states to which they belong.
And a few words about Zionism:
Article 22: Zionism is a political movement organically associated with international imperialism and antagonistic to all action for liberation and to progressive movements in the world. It is racist and fanatic in its nature, aggressive, expansionist, and colonial in its aims, and fascist in its methods. Israel is the instrument of the Zionist movement, and geographical base for world imperialism placed strategically in the midst of the Arab homeland to combat the hopes of the Arab nation for liberation, unity, and progress. Israel is a constant source of threat vis-a-vis peace in the Middle East and the whole world.
Article 23: The demand of security and peace, as well as the demand of right and justice, require all states to consider Zionism an illegitimate movement, to outlaw its existence, and to ban its operations, in order that friendly relations among peoples may be preserved, and the loyalty of citizens to their respective homelands safeguarded.
In other words this PLO Terrorist Organization, had been set up to destroy, to deal with the Jews on its own terms, despite lacking validity to its claims that the State of Israel had no legitimacy or legality, despite the factual historical truth of the establishment of Israel- was that it was voted on and agreed to by the League of Nations. Israel has every right to exist, and in actual fact was established much the same way as Saudi Arabia, Trans Jordan (which was established as the Palestinian Homeland)”, and other Middle East countries after the carve up of the Ottoman Empire. A little thing called facts which the self named Arab Palestinians like to ignore and the slick propaganda by them ignore also.
The online website also states:
“At a 1974 meeting in Cairo, the Palestinian National Council adopted a "phased plan" to eliminate Israel that sought to establish some territory under Palestinian control and then use that as leverage to continue to fight and ultimately to have an all-out war that would destroy Israel forever.”
It clearly has succeeded in this phase under its covenant to achieve control of the disputed territories, and as history has seen, has not ceased to wage a constant warfare against Israel, allowing its land to be used to wage missile rocket attacks with increasing sophistication, and psychological warfare against the Jewish people themselves using historical revisionism to weaken the will of the elected government of Israel itself to have the will to defend the State of Israel from being further carved into smaller and smaller pieces so that it can not ever survive the enemies which surround them on any level either militaristically from any attacks, nor from the de legitimization of Israel by the self proclaimed Arab Palestinians.
Unless there is a change of government of Israel, and a future Government of Israel has the courage and intestinal fortitude and courage, to say no more to further dismemberment of the Sovereign and God given State of Israel’s land mass, ( 75 per cent less than what they had been promised by the deceptive British) Israel and its people, are at serious threat of a new Holocaust being directed to the entire Jewish people, economically, demographically psychologically and in reality through continuing use of terror.
The Government of Israel must learn from its mistakes and no longer agree to trade land for peace which has been constantly promised and never delivered. The Government of Israel must learn from the past and re direct itself and its resources to defend the entire State of Israel against its enemies, deport all known terrorists, terrorist sympathizers’, ban all Palestinians from the Knesset and revoke all citizenship from all Palestinian persons and force them to leave Israel in total, as the Jews were forced to do so by Arab nations prior to the invasion and attacks by the Arab neighbors upon the establishment of Israel in 1948. They must for the sake of the Jewish nations survival against enemies which have never, and will never stop attacking Israel until it is destroyed, refuse to submit to the terrorists, in cowering fear of what they might do if their demands are not met and instead deal with the terrorists themselves and not rely of empty promises of Saudis, Usa and so on.
The Government of Israel must learn from Islamic law that no peace agreement can ever exceed 10 years, and any peace signed is only ever temporary. So rather than appease and capitulate in fear to threats by murderous self destructive death glorifying culture at its gates, it must first defend its own culture and lives to ensure its own people are protected. To date not one member of the Israeli Government has achieved this.’
As predicted by the Bible, Israel is surrounded at its borders by enemies all around. Will the Government of Israel capitulate and allow the genocide of its own people when it can prevent this by refusing to further participate in any carving up of Israel and expel the enemies within to other Arab nations to their Islamic Umma to support. This action by the Jewish nation is not without precedence from its Arab nation enemies and neighbors whom did the very same thing to the Jews.
Has the Government of Israel got the courage to defend its own people and nation from destruction which otherwise is inevitable?. Will it be able to face God in the future and admit that the mistakes it makes as appeasement continues, was a mistake at all?.
Israel stands on teh brink of its very own destruction and has failed the propaganda war, it does not have to prove its legitimacy - it already was for 60 years under teh United Nations, and frnakly why does Israel care what the world thinks?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)